Skip to content

Methodology

How we got to that number.

Here is each coefficient, and the public source behind it.

Status

The product is in preliminary calibration. Projections on the calculator and on a Pitch Sheet are anchored to 9 public industry baselines and academic meta-analyses, and each dollar figure carries a band of ±30%. The band is the range the true number is likely to sit in, and it tightens with each post-event check we take in.

The four behavioural pillars

A speaker is scored across four pillars, derived from face, body, and voice signals on uploaded video:

  • Poise. Composure under load. Brow stillness, postural stability, vocal cleanness.

  • Animation. Visible energy. Expression dynamics, gesture amplitude, vocal range.

  • Connection. Audience-direction signals. Gaze, engagement intensity, vocal pacing discipline.

  • Conviction. Channel congruence and the absence of leakage cues (suppression, contempt, peak asymmetry).

The four blend into a composite Proof of Impact (POI) score on 0-100, on weights we chose, mapped to four bands:

  • Foundation0-49
  • Capable50-69
  • Elite70-84
  • Iconic85-100

Each pillar also carries a confidence figure: the share of input weight that had data behind it, across face track, body track, and prosody. Prosody is the pitch, pace, and loudness of a voice. A pillar below the confidence floor is dropped from the composite and flagged.

Pillar → outcome attribution

Each outcome metric runs on a weighted blend of pillars. Rows sum to 1.00.

OutcomePoiseAnimationConnectionConviction
Retention lift0.100.400.350.15
On-site spend0.100.350.300.25
Return rate0.200.250.250.30
Sponsor activation0.150.300.250.30
Social amplification0.100.250.200.45

Animation and Connection carry the immediate outcomes, retention and on-site spend, because those are the pillars that hold a room. Conviction carries the durable ones, return rate, sponsor renewal, and social amplification, on the reasoning that authenticity is what gets remembered.

Tier multipliers

POI band → outcome multiplier against a Capable-median speaker:

BandScore rangeOutcome multiplier
Foundation0-490.70×
Capable50-691.00×
Elite70-841.25×
Iconic85-1001.50×

Each step traces to a published floor. Capable to Elite is +25%, matching the low end of vocal-variation retention research and of well-designed upsell uplift. Elite to Iconic adds another +25%, matching the source-effects expertise band in the persuasion meta-analysis literature. The Foundation penalty of 0.70 matches the 25-30% session drop-off in EventsAir KPI data.

Baselines

Where the dollar figures come from. These are medians from public, mostly Western corporate event data:

  • Median session retention rate: 70%
  • Median additional on-site spend per attendee: $26.62
  • Median YoY rebooking rate: 45%
  • Median sponsor renewal probability: 55%

Supply your own event context, meaning audience size, ticket price, on-site spend per head, sponsor revenue, and prior-year return rate, and it overrides these. The calculator opens on a 1,500-attendee corporate conference at a $1,200 ticket, $180 on-site spend, and $2M in sponsor revenue.

Confidence intervals

Each dollar projection, on the calculator and on a Pitch Sheet, carries a symmetric band of ±30%. Symmetric means the band runs the same distance either side, and the half-width is the distance from the number to one edge. We would rather show a wide band we can stand behind than a tight one we cannot.

The band on the total is computed by root-sum-of-squares across the per-metric half-widths, which assumes those errors are roughly independent. If production calibration correlates them, the total band widens.

Post-event reconciliation uploads feed the calibration loop: audience retention from the event app, post-event survey scores, sponsor renewal commitments, and social mention volume. The bands tighten with √N, the square root of the number of sessions. On that assumption, 200 measured-outcome sessions bring the half-width to ±15%, and one thousand brings it to ±10%.

Sources

Each coefficient on this page traces to one of these, and the underlying claims are public.

  • 76-study, 36,031-individual meta-analysis — charisma is a measurable behavioural construct (vocal delivery, gestures, facial expression, eye contact) and predicts task performance, citizenship, and group performance.

  • Vocal pitch variation lifts retention scores by up to 25%. Eye contact maintained 90% of the time rates a speaker 20% more persuasive. Storytelling makes information 22× more memorable than facts alone.

  • 67% of event planners say finding the right speaker is the most time-consuming part of their job. 49% of marketers say audience engagement is the single biggest contributor to a successful event.

  • Industry baseline: organisers generate ≈ $26.62 additional on-site revenue per attendee beyond the base ticket price. Larger events exceed $40 per attendee. On-site spend (F&B, merch, premium upgrades) is 15-30% of total live event revenue.

  • F&B accounts for 29% of exhibition + meeting cost. Combined F&B + AV + speaker/entertainment line items account for 55% of total meeting spend — the speaker is not a rounding error in the P&L.

  • 72% of CPG event attendees post or share brand content after an event (Spiro). Receiving post-event communications increased purchase intent by 45%. Attendance retention is tracked as a key ROI metric by 59% of marketers (Splash).

  • B2B event leads typically cost $150-300 each. Average event ROI is 25-34% across the industry, varying with attendance, sponsorship revenue, and brand awareness.

  • Sponsor booth location: prime locations near registration, coffee stations, and main stages see 3× more traffic than tucked-corner locations. Sessions immediately following high-engagement programming see materially higher booth traffic in the post-session window.

  • Meta-analysis: speaker expertise has the largest single effect on persuasion outcomes — averaging 16% of explained variance. Trustworthiness and dynamism (perceived energy / animation) follow as the next two largest factors.

Open Door Policy

If you find a number on this site we can't defend, tell us.

trust@grwproject.app