Status
The product is in preliminary calibration. Projections on the calculator and on a Pitch Sheet are anchored to 9 public industry baselines and academic meta-analyses, and each dollar figure carries a band of ±30%. The band is the range the true number is likely to sit in, and it tightens with each post-event check we take in.
The four behavioural pillars
A speaker is scored across four pillars, derived from face, body, and voice signals on uploaded video:
Poise. Composure under load. Brow stillness, postural stability, vocal cleanness.
Animation. Visible energy. Expression dynamics, gesture amplitude, vocal range.
Connection. Audience-direction signals. Gaze, engagement intensity, vocal pacing discipline.
Conviction. Channel congruence and the absence of leakage cues (suppression, contempt, peak asymmetry).
The four blend into a composite Proof of Impact (POI) score on 0-100, on weights we chose, mapped to four bands:
- Foundation0-49
- Capable50-69
- Elite70-84
- Iconic85-100
Each pillar also carries a confidence figure: the share of input weight that had data behind it, across face track, body track, and prosody. Prosody is the pitch, pace, and loudness of a voice. A pillar below the confidence floor is dropped from the composite and flagged.
Pillar → outcome attribution
Each outcome metric runs on a weighted blend of pillars. Rows sum to 1.00.
| Outcome | Poise | Animation | Connection | Conviction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retention lift | 0.10 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.15 |
| On-site spend | 0.10 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.25 |
| Return rate | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.30 |
| Sponsor activation | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.30 |
| Social amplification | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.45 |
Animation and Connection carry the immediate outcomes, retention and on-site spend, because those are the pillars that hold a room. Conviction carries the durable ones, return rate, sponsor renewal, and social amplification, on the reasoning that authenticity is what gets remembered.
Tier multipliers
POI band → outcome multiplier against a Capable-median speaker:
| Band | Score range | Outcome multiplier |
|---|---|---|
| Foundation | 0-49 | 0.70× |
| Capable | 50-69 | 1.00× |
| Elite | 70-84 | 1.25× |
| Iconic | 85-100 | 1.50× |
Each step traces to a published floor. Capable to Elite is +25%, matching the low end of vocal-variation retention research and of well-designed upsell uplift. Elite to Iconic adds another +25%, matching the source-effects expertise band in the persuasion meta-analysis literature. The Foundation penalty of 0.70 matches the 25-30% session drop-off in EventsAir KPI data.
Baselines
Where the dollar figures come from. These are medians from public, mostly Western corporate event data:
- Median session retention rate: 70%
- Median additional on-site spend per attendee: $26.62
- Median YoY rebooking rate: 45%
- Median sponsor renewal probability: 55%
Supply your own event context, meaning audience size, ticket price, on-site spend per head, sponsor revenue, and prior-year return rate, and it overrides these. The calculator opens on a 1,500-attendee corporate conference at a $1,200 ticket, $180 on-site spend, and $2M in sponsor revenue.
Confidence intervals
Each dollar projection, on the calculator and on a Pitch Sheet, carries a symmetric band of ±30%. Symmetric means the band runs the same distance either side, and the half-width is the distance from the number to one edge. We would rather show a wide band we can stand behind than a tight one we cannot.
The band on the total is computed by root-sum-of-squares across the per-metric half-widths, which assumes those errors are roughly independent. If production calibration correlates them, the total band widens.
Post-event reconciliation uploads feed the calibration loop: audience retention from the event app, post-event survey scores, sponsor renewal commitments, and social mention volume. The bands tighten with √N, the square root of the number of sessions. On that assumption, 200 measured-outcome sessions bring the half-width to ±15%, and one thousand brings it to ±10%.
Sources
Each coefficient on this page traces to one of these, and the underlying claims are public.
76-study, 36,031-individual meta-analysis — charisma is a measurable behavioural construct (vocal delivery, gestures, facial expression, eye contact) and predicts task performance, citizenship, and group performance.
Vocal pitch variation lifts retention scores by up to 25%. Eye contact maintained 90% of the time rates a speaker 20% more persuasive. Storytelling makes information 22× more memorable than facts alone.
67% of event planners say finding the right speaker is the most time-consuming part of their job. 49% of marketers say audience engagement is the single biggest contributor to a successful event.
- Ticket Fairy — Venue KPIs 2026industry
Industry baseline: organisers generate ≈ $26.62 additional on-site revenue per attendee beyond the base ticket price. Larger events exceed $40 per attendee. On-site spend (F&B, merch, premium upgrades) is 15-30% of total live event revenue.
F&B accounts for 29% of exhibition + meeting cost. Combined F&B + AV + speaker/entertainment line items account for 55% of total meeting spend — the speaker is not a rounding error in the P&L.
72% of CPG event attendees post or share brand content after an event (Spiro). Receiving post-event communications increased purchase intent by 45%. Attendance retention is tracked as a key ROI metric by 59% of marketers (Splash).
B2B event leads typically cost $150-300 each. Average event ROI is 25-34% across the industry, varying with attendance, sponsorship revenue, and brand awareness.
- EventsAir — 10 Event KPIsindustry
Sponsor booth location: prime locations near registration, coffee stations, and main stages see 3× more traffic than tucked-corner locations. Sessions immediately following high-engagement programming see materially higher booth traffic in the post-session window.
Meta-analysis: speaker expertise has the largest single effect on persuasion outcomes — averaging 16% of explained variance. Trustworthiness and dynamism (perceived energy / animation) follow as the next two largest factors.